Alex Lorenzelli
Key strength: Axonometrics demonstrate spatial complexity and experimentation.
Most significant weakness: Architecture seems sterile and lacks connection with surrounding landscape.
Alisa Parveen
Key strength: Conceptual underpinning of architecture and its connection (interconnection) with landscape.
Most significant weakness: Textures have sunk in quality compared to earlier samples, in terms of experimentation. Refer to your EXP1 textures.
Ben Filler
Key strength: Great axos and textures.
Most significant weakness: Thinking behind architecture has room to improve. Concepts are there, but expression of them through architecture is a bit literal and elements are cluttered and confusion. Next experiment focus on bringing all the ideas together using a single encompassing concept.
Bridget Allen
Key strength: Clear intent and purpose behind architecture. Great textures.
Most significant weakness: Architecture lacking a sense of resolve and refinement. Perhaps the scheme could have capitalised on using detailed elements to articulate the massing model.
Christopher John Day
Key strength: Architecture demonstrates confidence and maturity, taking risk without being reckless.
Most significant weakness: Presentation of final scheme, images + textures + axos could be arranged to display thoughtfulness behind design and thinking.
Chun Ho Chiu
Key strength: The proportions of the architecture are appropriate in scale.
Most significant weakness: Drawings if improved could have moved this scheme up a grade. Architecture would benefit from further risk taking and experimentation.
James Crowe
Key strength: Consideration of architecture proportions, texturing and siting.
Most significant weakness: Scheme could benefit greatly if it were presented more holistically, whether this is in poster form or video clip.
Jiming Wang
Key strength: Work shows competency in architecture and drawing.
Most significant weakness: Scheme lacks detail in both architecture and landscape. In the next experiment please consider creating architecture that engages the landscape and that excites a viewer’s attention or experience
Kaung Myat Htoo Kyi
Key strength: Axonometrics were a great starting point for creating some engaging and interesting architecture
Most significant weakness: Ideas were not realised in architecture or landform.
Minshan May Huang
Key strength: Great drawings and animated gifs for presentation. Also placement of textures on architecture ties the fragmented surfaces together.
Most significant weakness: Lack of complexity in massing model and dialogue with landscape.
Mohamad Saj
Key strength: Arrangement and proportions of architecture is thoughtful and refined.
Most significant weakness: Improvement in drawings, precision and experimentation could have pushed this scheme up a grade.
Nastaran (Nina) Jafarigolrokh
Key strength: Ideas and concepts are refined and thoughtful.
Most significant weakness: Drawing could improve with more care and time taken. Architecture needs to push boundaries and express the ideas which you have so eloquently described in text.
Nikko Sudirman
Key strength: Alignment of architectural concepts with built form.
Most significant weakness: Landscape lacked development compared to the architecture.
Suek Yi Lim
Key strength: Architecture considered in detail circulation, connecting spaces and movement between levels.
Most significant weakness: Lack of understanding of axonometrics.
Weijie (Mike) Shen
Key strength: Beautiful how the architecture touches the water, then retreats into the mountains.
Most significant weakness: Presentation of images and architecture could have pushed this scheme up a grade.
Wen Chen
Key strength: Beautiful drawings and textures, precision in linework and rendering shows care and consideration.
Most significant weakness: Architecture is a bit too modest, it could benefit from some complexity whilst keeping its overall simplicity.
Yu-En (Timmy) Lin
Key strength: Detailed attention to landscape and its relationship to the architecture.
Most significant weakness: Neon lights a bit overboard, especially when drawing much inspiration from Falling Water. Aim to learn lessons from architects and their buildings. What is it about the precedent which engages your attention?
No comments:
Post a Comment